<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why On Net Percentage is Real and Why it Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 18:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Potvin</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/#comment-147957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Potvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=596#comment-147957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just found out about depthockeyanalytics.com via Ian Cooper article on LinkedIn on Analytics in hockey.
I agree with above &quot;Why On Net Percentage is Real and Why it Matters&quot; ... in order to understand this you need to know the game ; unfortunately, not all GMs and coaches do, even at the professional level.
The proper analytics combined with people that &quot;really&quot; understand the game can be a large competitive advantage.
Having played it for most of the last 50 years, I love it.

Looking forward to following your group!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found out about depthockeyanalytics.com via Ian Cooper article on LinkedIn on Analytics in hockey.<br />
I agree with above "Why On Net Percentage is Real and Why it Matters" ... in order to understand this you need to know the game ; unfortunately, not all GMs and coaches do, even at the professional level.<br />
The proper analytics combined with people that "really" understand the game can be a large competitive advantage.<br />
Having played it for most of the last 50 years, I love it.</p>
<p>Looking forward to following your group!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hockey&#039;s great shots debate</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/#comment-146784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hockey&#039;s great shots debate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=596#comment-146784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be ignored (for those with slow doubts, there’s a some-more detailed contention and additional data on a [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be ignored (for those with slow doubts, there’s a some-more detailed contention and additional data on a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hockey&#8217;s great shots debate &#8211; Sports Illustrated &#124; Quick &#38; Fast Sports News</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/#comment-146778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hockey&#8217;s great shots debate &#8211; Sports Illustrated &#124; Quick &#38; Fast Sports News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=596#comment-146778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be overlooked (for those with lingering doubts, there’s a more detailed discussion and additional data on our [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be overlooked (for those with lingering doubts, there’s a more detailed discussion and additional data on our [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#039;s Wrong With the Minnesota Wild, pt II: Shot Quality</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/#comment-146776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What&#039;s Wrong With the Minnesota Wild, pt II: Shot Quality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=596#comment-146776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] There&#8217;s some reason to believe that hitting the net on a shot attempt is a repeatable skill. Statistically, it&#8217;s not as easy to prove as you might guess when you&#8217;re yell &#8220;Shoot the puck Granny!&#8221; at your TV. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There&#8217;s some reason to believe that hitting the net on a shot attempt is a repeatable skill. Statistically, it&#8217;s not as easy to prove as you might guess when you&#8217;re yell &#8220;Shoot the puck Granny!&#8221; at your TV. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hockey&#039;s great shots debate &#124; &#124; Geoponet Sports</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/why-on-net-percentage-is-real-and-why-it-matters/#comment-146773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hockey&#039;s great shots debate &#124; &#124; Geoponet Sports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=596#comment-146773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be overlooked (for those with lingering doubts, there’s a more detailed discussion and additional data on our [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a repeatable skill, it shouldn’t be overlooked (for those with lingering doubts, there’s a more detailed discussion and additional data on our [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
