<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ducks Luck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/ducks-luck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/ducks-luck/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 18:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/ducks-luck/#comment-122561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 13:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=545#comment-122561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bad news for Bodreau - his team is on to the conference finals]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bad news for Bodreau - his team is on to the conference finals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/ducks-luck/#comment-122560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=545#comment-122560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bad new for Bodreau - his team is on the the conference finals]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bad new for Bodreau - his team is on the the conference finals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: federov</title>
		<link>http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/uncategorized/ducks-luck/#comment-120362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[federov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depthockeyanalytics.com/?p=545#comment-120362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tLooking at Palansky&#039;s summary of Anaheim&#039;s one goal game results and his analysis of those results, it is time to speak up; and yes, I did note the date the article was published. There&#039;s been a lot of changes in the NHL over the years, and the sad part is that in depth statistics were not available before many of these changes came into place. As I see it, most analysts are applying neophyte knowledge to a game that is &#039;based on&#039; hockey but is not exactly hockey. One-goal-game analysis would work only if the rules were applied to Rocket Richard&#039;s time. It can still be done though, if one widens the blinkers. 

Three simple mental adjustments:
~ A shoot-out is not a one goal game, it is a tie game.
~ A victory in a sparse 5 minute overtime is not a one goal game, it is a tie game.
~ A two goal victory where an empty net goal was scored is not a two goal game, it is a one goal game.

The players know this. They also know that getting the two points is all that really matters. So now teams can get one point for a loss and a guy can score his third goal for a hat trick with no goalie in sight. The Rocket never did that.

PS ~I&#039;m not complaining about the game or player skills today, only about slow development of the brains doing analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tLooking at Palansky's summary of Anaheim's one goal game results and his analysis of those results, it is time to speak up; and yes, I did note the date the article was published. There's been a lot of changes in the NHL over the years, and the sad part is that in depth statistics were not available before many of these changes came into place. As I see it, most analysts are applying neophyte knowledge to a game that is 'based on' hockey but is not exactly hockey. One-goal-game analysis would work only if the rules were applied to Rocket Richard's time. It can still be done though, if one widens the blinkers. </p>
<p>Three simple mental adjustments:<br />
~ A shoot-out is not a one goal game, it is a tie game.<br />
~ A victory in a sparse 5 minute overtime is not a one goal game, it is a tie game.<br />
~ A two goal victory where an empty net goal was scored is not a two goal game, it is a one goal game.</p>
<p>The players know this. They also know that getting the two points is all that really matters. So now teams can get one point for a loss and a guy can score his third goal for a hat trick with no goalie in sight. The Rocket never did that.</p>
<p>PS ~I'm not complaining about the game or player skills today, only about slow development of the brains doing analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
